Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Kevin A. ROBINSON, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 17, 2003, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed. The record establishes that claimant operates a small business selling fragrances and body oils. As part of his business venture, claimant maintained a business checking account, passed out business cards, sold products to clients and regularly placed orders for the products. Claimant is looking to expand the business, possibly by opening a small store, and intends to claim any net losses or gains on his personal income tax return. Although claimant testified that his business is not yet profitable, he nevertheless stood to gain financially from the continued operation of the business (see Matter of Rhode [Commissioner of Labor], 274 A.D.2d 725, 726, 710 N.Y.S.2d 724 [2000] ). Under these circumstances we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision that claimant's activities constitute employment within the meaning of the Labor Law (see Matter of Standig [Commissioner of Labor], 3 A.D.3d 828, 771 N.Y.S.2d 260 [2004]; Matter of Rhode [Commissioner of Labor], supra at 726, 710 N.Y.S.2d 724).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 22, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)