Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Patricia E. PHILLIPS, Appellant. Organon Pharmaceuticals, Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 20, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant worked for the employer as a pharmaceutical sales specialist from May 2000 until she was discharged in July 2002 for falsifying documents. Specifically, she represented on certain expense forms that she conducted events for physicians on May 3, 2002 and May 28, 2002 when, in fact, such events were not held, and claimant instead purchased gift certificates totaling $810 and $750. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied her claim for unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that her employment was terminated due to misconduct. Claimant now appeals.
We affirm. It is well settled that the submission of falsified or altered documents to an employer may constitute disqualifying misconduct (see Matter of Little [Commissioner of Labor], 3 A.D.3d 829, 770 N.Y.S.2d 912 [2004]; Matter of Gonyou [Commissioner of Labor], 297 A.D.2d 848, 849, 747 N.Y.S.2d 129 [2002] ). Here, claimant admitted to providing deceptive information on the expense forms, but asserted that she received her district manager's authorization to purchase the gift certificates. This presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Chang [Wolgin-Commissioner of Labor], 7 A.D.3d 908, 776 N.Y.S.2d 653 [2004] ) and, in any event, is not an excuse for claimant's conduct. Claimant's remaining contentions, including her due process claim, have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 16, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)