Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Francis COLES, respondent, v. Ann SOBERS, appellant.
In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J.), dated May 23, 1997, as, after a hearing, granted permanent custody of her two children to their maternal grandmother.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
On appeal, the mother concedes that the children's prolonged custody with their maternal grandmother constituted extraordinary circumstances sufficient for the court to proceed to a consideration of the best interests of the children (see, Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 387 N.Y.S.2d 821, 356 N.E.2d 277), but contends that the record does not support the Family Court's resolution of this issue. We disagree.
The record provides a sound and substantial basis for the Family Court's conclusion that it was in the children's best interests to remain in the custody of their grandmother (see, Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 451 N.Y.S.2d 658, 436 N.E.2d 1260; Matter of Kulakowich v. Zingarelli, 249 A.D.2d 306, 670 N.Y.S.2d 355; Matter of Nellie R. v. Betty S., 187 A.D.2d 597, 589 N.Y.S.2d 1000). The court's decision reveals that it considered all of the requisite factors in making its determination and did not base its decision solely on the length of time the children were in their grandmother's custody (see, Matter of DiMedio v. DiMedio, 233 A.D.2d 394, 650 N.Y.S.2d 746; Hanway v. Hanway, 208 A.D.2d 499, 617 N.Y.S.2d 54).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 08, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)