Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Carl JOHNSON, Jr., appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), rendered March 21, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence on the conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing in accordance herewith.
The defendant's contention that he was improperly sentenced because he suffers from mental illness is based upon post-conviction prison psychiatric records which are dehors the record. Accordingly, this claim cannot be reviewed on a direct appeal from the judgment (see, People v. Banks, 244 A.D.2d 560, 664 N.Y.S.2d 816; People v. Grazzette, 211 A.D.2d 822, 621 N.Y.S.2d 917).
We find no merit to the defendant's argument that the sentence imposed upon him for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree was excessive. However, since the court failed to pronounce sentence upon his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, the matter must be remitted for resentencing on both counts in accordance with CPL 380.20 (see, People v. Sturgis, 69 N.Y.2d 816, 513 N.Y.S.2d 961, 506 N.E.2d 532; People v. Santiago, 231 A.D.2d 652, 647 N.Y.S.2d 954; People v. McKinney, 215 A.D.2d 407, 625 N.Y.S.2d 667; People v. James, 188 A.D.2d 550, 591 N.Y.S.2d 360).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 08, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)