Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JOSEPH CRENSHAW BUILDERS, INC., plaintiff, v. SUMMIT GENERAL CONTRACTING CORP., defendant, Town of Brookhaven, defendant and interpleader plaintiff-respondent, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, defendant-respondent; Summit Waterproofing & Restoration Corp., interpleader defendant-appellant, et al., Riverhead Building Supply Corp., et al., interpleader defendants, Worth Supply Co., Inc., et al., interpleader defendants-respondents.
In an action to foreclose on a mechanic's lien, the interpleader defendant Summit Waterproofing & Restoration Corp. appeals (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated February 10, 1997, as granted the motion of the defendant interpleader plaintiff Town of Brookhaven to discharge the Town as a stakeholder and denied its cross motion to dismiss certain Lien Law claims, and (2) from so much of an order of the same court, dated October 8, 1997, as, sua sponte, modified the order dated February 10, 1997, by vacating a so-ordered stipulation of settlement dated November 16, 1996.
ORDERED that, on the court's own motion, the appellant's notice of appeal from the order dated October 8, 1997, is treated as an application for leave to appeal therefrom, and leave to appeal is granted (see, CPLR 5701[c] ); and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated February 10, 1997, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated October 8, 1997; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order dated October 8, 1997, is reversed insofar as appealed from, the stipulation is reinstated, the motion and cross motion are denied as academic, and the order dated February 10, 1997, is modified accordingly; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant is awarded one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The Supreme Court erred in setting aside the parties' stipulation without a showing of fraud, collusion, mistake, or accident (see, Hallock v. State of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 224, 230, 485 N.Y.S.2d 510, 474 N.E.2d 1178; Siegel v. Ocean Park Hous. Co., 248 A.D.2d 459, 668 N.Y.S.2d 932).
In light of the foregoing, the defendant Fireman's Fund Insurance Company may, if it be so advised, renew its motion to resettle the reinstated stipulation.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 15, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)