Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ronald GRASSEL, Appellant, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, State of New York, et al., Respondents-Respondents, et al., Respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Public Employment Relations Board, State of New York, dated August 7, 2000, which, inter alia, dismissed the petitioner's improper practice charge against the respondent United Federation of Teachers, Local 2, for failure to prove a prima facie case, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated October 17, 2001, as denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding as to those respondents.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
The petitioner, Ronald Grassel, was a high school teacher employed by the Board of Education of the City of New York. He was served with disciplinary charges pursuant to Education Law § 3020-a. The respondent United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 (hereinafter the UFT) provided the petitioner with legal representation for his defense, and assigned attorney Mitchell H. Rubinstein. The hearing date was set for September 14, 1998. During the weeks prior to the hearing, Rubinstein made five unsuccessful attempts to contact the petitioner to prepare for his defense. Rubinstein eventually withdrew as counsel on the ground that the petitioner failed to cooperate with him in the preparation for the hearing.
To establish a breach of the duty of fair representation, it is necessary to show that a union's conduct was arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith (see Matter of Incorporated Vil. of Lynbrook v. New York State Public Employment Relations Bd., 48 N.Y.2d 398, 404-405, 423 N.Y.S.2d 466, 399 N.E.2d 55; Ponticello v. County of Suffolk, 225 A.D.2d 751, 752, 640 N.Y.S.2d 169). Here, Rubinstein withdrew from representation as a result of the petitioner's failure to cooperate with him in preparing his defense. Counsel reasonably concluded that the petitioner did not intend to participate in his defense. Since the petitioner failed to establish a breach of the union's duty of fair representation, the Supreme Court properly denied his petition and dismissed the proceeding insofar as asserted against the Public Employment Relations Board, State of New York and the UFT (Matter of Incorporated Vil. of Lynbrook v. New York State Public Employment Relations Bd., supra; Ponticello v. County of Suffolk, supra at 752, 640 N.Y.S.2d 169).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 13, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)