Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ARVERNE SECOND AMENDED URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT. Red Castle Bakeries, Inc., appellant; City of New York, et al., respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to EDPL 402(B), Red Castle Bakeries, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.) dated March 3, 2006, which denied its motion, inter alia, to direct the condemnor City of New York to make compensation payments to it for real estate interests and fixtures affected by the condemnation proceeding.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
According to a lease entered into between Red Castle Bakeries, Inc. (hereinafter Red Castle), as tenant, and Loeb & Mayer (hereinafter L & M), as landlord, Red Castle had the option to purchase the demised building located on the parcel known as Lot 70 within 60 days of notice of the proposed taking by the City of New York. It is undisputed that Red Castle did not exercise its option to purchase. Contrary to Red Castle's contention, a tenant who does not exercise its option to purchase has no interest in the real estate and is not entitled to a share of the compensation paid in a condemnation proceeding (Matter of City of New York [Upper New York Bay], 246 N.Y. 1, 33, 157 N.E. 911, cert. denied 276 U.S. 626, 48 S.Ct. 320, 72 L.Ed. 738; Matter of City of New York [Cross-Bronx Expressway], 195 Misc. 842, 82 N.Y.S.2d 55; cf. Hutt v. Johnson, 135 A.D.2d 501, 522 N.Y.S.2d 9).
The Supreme Court properly dismissed Red Castle's claim to be compensated for a refrigeration facility located on land owned by the City and subleased to Red Castle by L & M. According to the terms of the lease between the City and L & M, the refrigeration facility became the property of the City. Therefore, Red Castle was not entitled to compensation for the fixtures (see Matter of City of New York [G & C Amusements], 55 N.Y.2d 353, 359, 449 N.Y.S.2d 671, 434 N.E.2d 1038; Matter of Village of Port Chester v. Martinez, 5 A.D.3d 692, 774 N.Y.S.2d 751; Interlake Serv. Sta. v. State of New York, 249 A.D.2d 275, 670 N.Y.S.2d 914).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 09, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)