IN RE: MELISSA B. (Anonymous) (2008)

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Hunt, J.), dated July 11, 2007, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated June 4, 2007, made upon the appellant's admission, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted assault in the third degree, adjudged her to be a juvenile delinquent and placed her on probation for a period of 12 months.

ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

 The Family Court has broad discretion as to the dispositional orders it enters.   In this instance, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in adjudicating the appellant a juvenile delinquent and then placing her on probation for 12 months.   Such an adjudication was particularly appropriate in view of her relatively poor record of attendance at school and the recommendation made in the probation report that she is in need of supervision.   Moreover, the appellant in this case committed a type of misconduct that warrants a determination, at the least, that she was a juvenile delinquent.   That this was her first brush with the law does not entitle her to an adjudication of an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (hereinafter an ACD) (see Matter of Oneil D., 35 A.D.3d 602, 824 N.Y.S.2d 743;  Matter of Rosario S., 18 A.D.3d 563, 795 N.Y.S.2d 79;  Matter of Nikita P., 3 A.D.3d 499, 500-501, 769 N.Y.S.2d 602).

 We further note that an ACD is limited to a maximum period of six months.   Thus, once the Family Court determined that a period of supervision longer than six months was required, the entry of an ACD was no longer an option (see Family Ct. Act § 315.3[1];  see Matter of Antonio C., 294 A.D.2d 123, 741 N.Y.S.2d 520;  Matter of Raymond A., 136 A.D.2d 700, 523 N.Y.S.2d 901).

The appellant's remaining contention is without merit.