Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Mitchell S. BROOKSTONE et al., Appellants, v. STATE of New York, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Schaewe, J.), entered January 11, 2008, upon a decision of the court following a bifurcated trial in favor of defendant on the issue of liability.
Claimant Mitchell S. Brookstone (hereinafter claimant) was injured while playing a “pick-up” game of basketball on an outdoor asphalt court at Gilbert Lake State Park in Otsego County when, after jumping for a ball headed out of bounds, he landed on an uneven edge of the court. Thereafter, claimant and his wife, derivatively, commenced this action alleging, among other things, that defendant was negligent in the construction and maintenance of the basketball court. Following a bifurcated trial, the Court of Claims dismissed the claim, finding that claimant assumed the risks inherent in playing basketball on an outdoor court. Claimants appeal.
A voluntary participant in a sporting or recreational activity consents to the inherent risks arising out of such activity, including “those risks associated with the construction of the playing surface and any open and obvious condition on it” (Welch v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 272 A.D.2d 469, 469, 707 N.Y.S.2d 506 [2000]; see Lincoln v. Canastota Cent. School Dist., 53 A.D.3d 851, 852, 861 N.Y.S.2d 488 [2008] ). Notably, the Court of Appeals has determined that an irregular playing surface is an inherent risk of outdoor basketball (see Sykes v. County of Erie, 94 N.Y.2d 912, 913, 707 N.Y.S.2d 374, 728 N.E.2d 973 [2000]; Lincoln v. Canastota Cent. School Dist., 53 A.D.3d at 852, 861 N.Y.S.2d 488). Here, contrary to claimants' contention, the slightly uneven surface at the edge of the basketball court was an open and obvious risk and did not constitute an unreasonably dangerous condition (cf. Clark v. State of New York, 245 A.D.2d 413, 666 N.Y.S.2d 209 [1997] ). Accordingly, the Court of Claims properly dismissed the claim.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MALONE JR., J.
CARDONA, P.J., LAHTINEN and STEIN, JJ., concur; MERCURE, J., not taking part.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 16, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)