Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Brian J. BOORE, Appellant, v. Florence H. PARKS, Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Otsego County (Burns, J.), entered April 18, 2007, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct. Act article 6, for visitation with the parties' child.
Petitioner (hereinafter the father) and respondent (hereinafter the mother) are the biological parents of a child born in 1998. The father, who was in jail when the child was born, consented to entry of an order granting the mother sole custody with no visitation for him. Later, after not having seen the child for approximately six years, the father commenced this proceeding to obtain visitation while he was again incarcerated. Following a hearing, Family Court awarded him visitation by means of a video conference on one occasion. The father appeals, contending that Family Court should have granted him in-person jailhouse visitation.
Inasmuch as the father is no longer incarcerated, the appeal is moot (see Matter of Rebecca O. v. Todd P., 309 A.D.2d 982, 983, 766 N.Y.S.2d 144 [2003] ). To the extent that he seeks in-person visitation now that he has been released on parole, the proper course would be to seek such relief in a new petition affording Family Court an opportunity to determine the child's best interests under the father's current circumstances (see Matter of Anthony MM. v. Rena LL., 34 A.D.3d 1171, 1172, 827 N.Y.S.2d 707 [2006], lv. denied 8 N.Y.3d 805, 831 N.Y.S.2d 107, 863 N.E.2d 112 [2007] ).
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
ROSE, J.
PETERS, J.P., LAHTINEN, KANE and KAVANAGH, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 11, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)