Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: SHANEEKA TYSHEEKA J. (Anonymous). Nadine Anita J. (Anonymous), Appellant; St. Vincent's Services, Inc., Respondents (Proceeding No. 1). In the Matter of Tameeka Shameeka J. (Anonymous). Nadine Anita J. (Anonymous), Appellant; St. Vincent's Services, Inc., Respondent (Proceeding No. 2). In the Matter of Tyleisha Anita J. (Anonymous). Nadine Anita J. (Anonymous), Appellant; St. Vincent's Services, Inc., Respondent (Proceeding No. 3). In the Matter of Wyneisha Nicole J. (Anonymous). Nadine Anita J. (Anonymous), Appellant; St. Vincent's Services, Inc., Respondent (Proceeding No. 4).
In four proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law 384-b to terminate parental rights on the grounds of permanent neglect and that the mother is unable to care for the children as a result of mental retardation, the mother appeals from four orders of the Family Court, Kings County (Weinstein, J.), all dated September 29, 1999 (one in each proceeding), which, after a fact-finding hearing, terminated her parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the children to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and the petitioner St. Vincent's Services, Inc.
ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that the appellant is unable to care for the subject children as a result of mental retardation, resulting in fundamentally impaired judgment and an inability to provide adequately and properly for the subject children (see, Social Services Law 384-b[4][c]; Matter of Hime Y., 52 N.Y.2d 242, 437 N.Y.S.2d 286, 418 N.E.2d 1305). The court-appointed psychologist testified that based upon her examinations of the mother and her review of her medical records, the mother was suffering from mental retardation. The mother's condition is long-standing, and she possesses a history of poor judgment. Accordingly, the Family Court properly found that there was clear and convincing evidence that the mother presently and for the foreseeable future would be unable to care for the children by reason of mental retardation (see, Matter of Joyce T., 65 N.Y.2d 39, 489 N.Y.S.2d 705, 478 N.E.2d 1306).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 26, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)