Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Willy NAVARRO, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of the Inmate Disciplinary Program, Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits inmates from damaging or destroying State property, after he was charged in a misbehavior report with pulling a six-foot-long strip of plastic from the seat of a State vehicle in which he was being transported. Introduced in evidence at the disciplinary hearing was the misbehavior report and the testimony of a correction officer who stated that the vehicle had been inspected prior to the trip at which time all of its seats were intact. By the end of the trip, however, petitioner was in possession of a six-foot-long strip of plastic that matched a long tear in one of the vehicle's seat covers. We find this sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Jackson v. Dufrain, 221 A.D.2d 778, 633 N.Y.S.2d 421). To the extent that petitioner's testimony was in conflict with the testimony of the correction officer and the narration of the misbehavior report, this presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and are either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 09, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)