Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Christopher P. FITZGERALD, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, Jr., J.), rendered August 19, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree.
Following the imposition of the sentence upon defendant's plea of guilty to the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree, County Court, pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter Megan's Law) (Correction Law art. 6-C), conducted a risk level determination hearing, designating defendant a level two sex offender. Defendant now appeals from the judgment of conviction, intending to challenge the constitutionality of Megan's Law. On appeal from a judgment of conviction we may consider and determine any question of law or issue of fact arising from the underlying criminal proceeding (CPL 470.15[1] ). The application of this statute here precludes our consideration of the constitutionality of Megan's Law on this appeal since the risk level determination was not part of the criminal proceeding (see, People v. Stevens, 91 N.Y.2d 270, 669 N.Y.S.2d 962, 692 N.E.2d 985). We further note there is no statutory right of appeal from a risk level determination (supra).
Therefore, inasmuch as the record discloses that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and was sentenced in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement, we shall affirm the judgment and grant defense counsel's application for leave to withdraw (see, People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, 493 N.Y.S.2d 653, lv. denied 67 N.Y.2d 650, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1046, 490 N.E.2d 562).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 09, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)