Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Joseph J. D'IMPERIO, Sr., respondent-appellant, v. PUTNAM LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT, INC., appellant-respondent.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the Putnam Lake Fire Department, Inc., to provide certain documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law, the Putnam Lake Fire Department, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated March 16, 1998, as, inter alia, directed it to disclose certain specified documents, and Joseph J. D'Imperio cross-appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of the same judgment, as, inter alia, dismissed the petition insofar as it sought to annul the determination of the Putnam Lake Fire Department, Inc., denying his request for certain other documents.
ORDERED that the appeal of the Putnam Lake Fire Department, Inc., from so much of the judgment as directed it to provide disclosure of certain tax returns is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the appellant consented to that relief, and no appeal lies from an order entered on the consent of the appealing party (see, Baecher v. Baecher, 95 A.D.2d 841, 464 N.Y.S.2d 199); and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the petitioner's contentions, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition only in part. The Putnam Lake Fire Department, Inc., offered sufficient proof, in the submissions of its president and attorney, that certain of the documents sought by the petitioner were either not in its possession or did not exist (see, Public Officers Law § 89[3]; Matter of Gabriels v. Curiale, 216 A.D.2d 850, 628 N.Y.S.2d 882).
The parties' remaining contentions are either without merit, need not be addressed in light of this determination, or are improperly raised for the first time on appeal (see, Murray v. Palmer, 229 A.D.2d 377, 644 N.Y.S.2d 647).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 07, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)