Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Stamatios KAVOURIAS, appellant, v. BIG SIX PHARMACY INCORPORATED d/b/a John's Pharmacy, et al., respondents, et al., defendant.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated July 6, 1998, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Big Six Pharmacy Incorporated, d/b/a John's Pharmacy and Tard Realty Corp. which was to vacate so much of an order of the same court (Price, J.), dated June 7, 1995, as set the matter down for an inquest against them upon their failure to appear or answer.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Pursuant to CPLR 317, relief from a default may be obtained upon a showing that a defendant did not receive actual notice of the summons in time to defend, and has a meritorious defense (see, CPLR 317; Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d 138, 501 N.Y.S.2d 8, 492 N.E.2d 116; Concepcion v. Talon Realty Corp., 258 A.D.2d 494, 684 N.Y.S.2d 631; Mann-Tell Realty Corp. v. Cappadora Realty Corp., 184 A.D.2d 497, 498, 586 N.Y.S.2d 755). The plaintiff served the defendant Big Six Pharmacy Incorporated, d/b/a John's Pharmacy (hereinafter Big Six), the tenant of the premises, and the defendant Tard Realty Corp., the owner of the premises (hereinafter the corporate defendants) in December 1994 by delivering the requisite number of copies of the summons and complaint to the Secretary of State (see, Business Corporation Law § 306). Big Six had dissolved and the premises had been sold prior to service of the summons and complaint. The corporate defendants established that they did not receive actual notice of the summons in time to defend (cf., Board of Mgrs. of Landings at Patchogue Condominium v. 263 Riv. Ave. Corp., 243 A.D.2d 668, 663 N.Y.S.2d 291; Fleetwood Park Corp. v. Jerrick Waterproofing Co., 203 A.D.2d 238, 615 N.Y.S.2d 695; Anchor Sav. Bank v. Alpha Developers, 143 A.D.2d 711, 533 N.Y.S.2d 314), and that they have a meritorious defense (see, Anamdi v. Anugo, 229 A.D.2d 408, 644 N.Y.S.2d 804).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 14, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)