Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Mindy J. TREPEL, as Public Administrator of the Estate of Israel Yaeger, Deceased, respondent, v. METROPOLITAN SUBURBAN BUS AUTHORITY, et al., appellants.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated April 2, 1998, which granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to reargue and, upon reargument, denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the cause of action asserted in the complaint to recover damages for pain and suffering.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly concluded that the time within which an action must be commenced under Public Authorities Law § 1276(2) constitutes a period of limitation which may be tolled or extended pursuant to CPLR 210(a) (Yonkers Contr. Co. v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 93 N.Y.2d 375, 690 N.Y.S.2d 512, 712 N.E.2d 678; cf., Cohen v. Pearl Riv. Union Free School Dist., 51 N.Y.2d 256, 264, 434 N.Y.S.2d 138, 414 N.E.2d 639; Mingone v. State of New York, 100 A.D.2d 897, 474 N.Y.S.2d 557; Matter of Gelpi v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 90 A.D.2d 503, 504, 454 N.Y.S.2d 891; Santaniello v. De Francisco, 74 Misc.2d 229, 344 N.Y.S.2d 589, affd. 44 A.D.2d 831, 355 N.Y.S.2d 569; see also, Fleming v. Long Is. R. R., 72 N.Y.2d 998, 1000, 534 N.Y.S.2d 371, 530 N.E.2d 1291; but see, Cassandro v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Auth., 178 Misc.2d 484, 679 N.Y.S.2d 523).
In arguing to the contrary, the defendants rely on cases relating to the service of a notice of claim rather than to the commencement of an action (see, Pelnick v. State of New York, 171 A.D.2d 734, 567 N.Y.S.2d 290; Kaplan v. State of New York, 152 A.D.2d 417, 549 N.Y.S.2d 853), or upon statutes in which the Legislature unequivocally made commencement within a specific period a condition to the State's consent to suit (see, McKinney's Unconsolidated Laws of New York, § 7107 [L.1950, ch. 301, § 7]; Court of Claims Act § 8; see also, Yonkers Contr. Co. v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., supra). The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit (see, Daniel Perla Assoc. v. Ginsberg, 256 A.D.2d 303, 681 N.Y.S.2d 316).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 21, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)