Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Joanne E. ROBINSON, an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Joanne E. Robinson, Respondent.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in. She maintained a law office in New Jersey, where she was also admitted to practice in 1984.
Effective April 12, 1999, the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended respondent from practice for a period of three months for professional misconduct including neglect of a client matter, failure to communicate with the client, failure to provide the client with a written basis for her fee, and failure to cooperate with investigation of the client's complaint by the New Jersey disciplinary authorities. Respondent also practiced law despite a 1997 order of the Supreme Court declaring her ineligible to practice because of her failure to pay her 1997 annual assessment to the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection. Finally, an audit disclosed various recordkeeping deficiencies. The Supreme Court ordered respondent to refund the client $800 in legal fees prior to any application for reinstatement and directed respondent, upon reinstatement, to submit annual audits of her books and records, for a period of at least two years, to the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics.
Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline upon respondent (see, 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has not replied to or otherwise appeared in response to the motion. Under the circumstances presented, we grant the motion and further determine that the ends of justice will be served by imposing upon respondent the same discipline as was imposed in New Jersey, i.e., a suspension of three months (see, e.g., Matter of Gendel, 233 A.D.2d 613, 649 N.Y.S.2d 745; Matter of Karwell, 194 A.D.2d 862, 599 N.Y.S.2d 135).
ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective immediately, and until further order of this court; and it is further
ORDERED that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and she is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give to another any opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this court's rule (22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys.
PER CURIAM.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 23, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)