Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: AYODELE ADEMOLI J. (Anonymous). Catholic Home Bureau for Dependent Children, respondent; Elizabeth O. (Anonymous), appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother's parental rights by reason of her mental illness, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Salinitro, J.), dated May 18, 2005, which, after a hearing, terminated her parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the child to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and the Catholic Home Bureau for Dependent Children.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Catholic Home Bureau for Dependent Children, the petitioning agency, established by clear and convincing evidence that the mother was unable to properly and adequately care for her child, now and in the foreseeable future, by reason of mental illness (see Social Services Law § 384-b [3][g]; [4] [c]; Matter of Harlem Dowling-Westside Ctr. for Children & Family Servs. v. Marion L.C., 264 A.D.2d 845, 695 N.Y.S.2d 590; cf. Matter of Hime Y., 52 N.Y.2d 242, 245, 249, 437 N.Y.S.2d 286, 418 N.E.2d 1305). The testimony elicited from the agency's expert psychiatrist established that the mother suffered from schizophrenia. The evidence established that, due to her disorder, the mother was unable to act in accordance with her child's needs. The expert psychiatrist also opined that due to the nature of the mother's condition and her denial of it, as well as her denial of her child's special needs, the child would be at risk in the future if returned to the mother's care. This evidence constituted clear and convincing proof of the mother's inability to care for her child, now and in the foreseeable future (see Matter of Winston Lloyd D., 7 A.D.3d 706, 707, 777 N.Y.S.2d 175; Matter of Danielle C., 6 A.D.3d 530, 531, 774 N.Y.S.2d 431; Matter of Juliana V., 249 A.D.2d 314, 671 N.Y.S.2d 105).
The mother's remaining contentions do not require reversal.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 13, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)