Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: COUNTY OF PUTNAM, et al., appellants, v. PUTNAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC., respondent.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Shapiro, J.), dated August 20, 2004, which denied the petition and granted the motion of the Putnam County Deputy Sheriff's Benevolent Association, Inc., to compel arbitration.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The respondent, Putnam County Sheriff's Benevolent Association, Inc., demanded arbitration of various grievances pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement with the petitioners County of Putnam and Putnam County Sheriff. The petitioners commenced this proceeding to permanently stay such arbitration on the grounds that (1) the respondent's demand for arbitration was defective, (2) the respondent failed to comply with conditions precedent to arbitration set forth in the collective bargaining agreement, and (3) the demand for arbitration concerned multiple grievances in violation of the terms of the collective bargaining agreement. However, the collective bargaining agreement provides, in relevant part:
“The parties direct the arbitrator to decide, as a preliminary question, whether jurisdiction exists to hear and decide the matter in dispute. The jurisdiction of the arbitrator in deciding matters in dispute under the grievance procedure shall cover only disputes constituting a controversy arising over the interpretation, application, or alleged violation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Those matters determined by the arbitrator to be outside this definition shall not be decided by the arbitrator, except the determination of jurisdiction.”
All of the issues raised by the petition concerned either the interpretation or application of the terms and conditions of the collective bargaining agreement, or whether jurisdiction existed to hear and decide the matters in dispute. Thus, the issues were properly determined by the arbitrator (see Matter of Rockland County [Primiano Constr. Co.], 51 N.Y.2d 1, 431 N.Y.S.2d 478, 409 N.E.2d 951; Matter of Board of Educ. [Newburgh Teachers' Assn.], 58 A.D.2d 636, 396 N.Y.S.2d 40).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 12, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)