Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Larry PORTER, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with harassing a prison employee and committing a sexual offense in violation of the prison disciplinary rules. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing, which determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
The misbehavior report, the testimony of the correction officer who authored it and the testimony of the prison employee that petitioner harassed, together with the videotape of the incident, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Ruggiero v. Goord, 19 A.D.3d 907, 908, 796 N.Y.S.2d 752 [2005]; Matter of Goncalves v. Berbary, 14 A.D.3d 743, 744, 786 N.Y.S.2d 841 [2005] ). The record does not support petitioner's claim that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination of guilt flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Black v. Goord, 12 A.D.3d 1005, 1006, 784 N.Y.S.2d 911 [2004]; Matter of Johnson v. Ricks, 297 A.D.2d 889, 890, 747 N.Y.S.2d 402 [2002] ). To the extent that they were preserved, petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim of ineffective employee assistance, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 29, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)