Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Santo GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. Floyd BENNETT, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ellison, J.), entered November 2, 1998 in Chemung County, which dismissed petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
Petitioner commenced this habeas corpus proceeding alleging that the second count of the indictment was jurisdictionally defective because it does not contain factual allegations to support every element of the crime of attempted murder in the first degree. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and we affirm.
Because petitioner could have raised this issue on direct appeal from his conviction or in his CPL 440.10 motion, habeas corpus relief is unavailable in this case (see, People ex rel. Brown v. Commissioner of N.Y. State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 252 A.D.2d 602, 673 N.Y.S.2d 620; People ex rel. Best v. Senkowski, 200 A.D.2d 808, 606 N.Y.S.2d 427, appeal dismissed 83 N.Y.2d 951, 615 N.Y.S.2d 873, 639 N.E.2d 413). Furthermore, we find no extraordinary circumstances to justify a departure from traditional orderly procedure (see, id.). In any event, petitioner would not be entitled to immediate release given his conviction of various other felonies pursuant to the same indictment (see, People ex rel. Patterson v. Senkowski, 175 A.D.2d 957, 958, 573 N.Y.S.2d 611, lv. denied 78 N.Y.2d 864, 578 N.Y.S.2d 878, 586 N.E.2d 61).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 01, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)