Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jose VASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
After conducting a search of petitioner's cell, correction officers found two weapons secreted in the baseboard behind the radiator. Following a tier III hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from possessing weapons. In our view, the detailed misbehavior report provides substantial evidence supporting the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477; Matter of Cabral v. Great Meadow Correctional Facility, 261 A.D.2d 746, 691 N.Y.S.2d 587; Jay v. Coombe, 233 A.D.2d 661, 662, 649 N.Y.S.2d 831). Although petitioner denies that the weapons were his and asserts that his cellmate had access to the area in which the weapons were found, this is insufficient to defeat the inference of possession by petitioner under these circumstances (see, Matter of Fernandez v. Stinson, 251 A.D.2d 887, 888, 675 N.Y.S.2d 911; see also, Matter of Cabral v. Great Meadow Correctional Facility, supra; cf., Matter of Varela v. Coughlin, 203 A.D.2d 630, 610 N.Y.S.2d 103). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
CARDONA, P.J.
MIKOLL, MERCURE, PETERS and GRAFFEO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: July 22, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)