Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ASIA B. (Anonymous). Gregory H. (Anonymous), appellant; Commissioner of Social Services, et al., respondents.
In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper) of the Family Court, Kings County (Turbow, J.), dated July 22, 1998, which, after a fact-finding hearing, found that he had abused and neglected his child, Asia B., and released Asia B. to the mother.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the determination that his daughter is an abused and neglected child is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Family Ct. Act § 1046[B][i]; Matter of Tammie Z., 66 N.Y.2d 1, 494 N.Y.S.2d 686, 484 N.E.2d 1038). The evidence established that the child sustained a laceration to her head requiring stitches as a result of excessive corporal punishment by the appellant (see, Family Ct. Act § 1012[f] [i][B]; Matter of Tonya C., 220 A.D.2d 498, 632 N.Y.S.2d 180; Matter of Danielle YY., 188 A.D.2d 894, 591 N.Y.S.2d 636). Further, the appellant disciplined Asia B. by repeatedly hitting her on the head to “let her know I'm her father”, created a “substantial risk of physical injury * * * by other than accidental means which would be likely to cause * * * serious or protracted disfigurement, or protracted impairment of physical or emotional health or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily organ” (Family Ct. Act § 1012[e][ii]; see, Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs., 191 A.D.2d 634, 595 N.Y.S.2d 234; Matter of C. Children, 183 A.D.2d 767, 583 N.Y.S.2d 499).
The father's remaining contention is without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 29, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)