Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Josephine ROBINSON, et al., plaintiffs, v. JEWISH HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN, defendant third-party plaintiff second third-party plaintiff-appellant, et al., defendants; Anesthesiology Service, et al., third-party defendants; Adel Aziz, second third-party defendant-respondent.
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff second third-party plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), entered February 5, 2004, which, upon, inter alia, an order of the same court dated September 24, 2003, granting the motion of the second third-party defendant, among other things, to vacate a judgment of the same court dated May 3, 1999, and upon a prior stipulation of the parties, is in favor of the second third-party defendant and against it in the principal sum of $300,000, plus the sums of $521,700 as interest, $950 for costs, and $20,654.64 as an award of an attorney's fee.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the words “plus $20, 654.64 as reimbursement to Adel Aziz for attorneys fees” from the decretal paragraph thereof; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the second third-party defendant.
In response to the refusal of the defendant third-party plaintiff second third-party plaintiff Jewish Hospital and Medical Center of Brooklyn (hereinafter the Hospital) to agree to the entry of judgment pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the second third-party defendant, Adel Aziz, moved, inter alia, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, for an award of an attorney's fee. However, the Supreme Court failed, as required by 22 NYCRR 130-1.2, to state why it found the amount of the award imposed to be appropriate. Accordingly, since the parties' stipulation did not provide for an award of an attorney's fee, under the circumstances of this case, that portion of the judgment which awarded an attorney's fee must be vacated (see Morrison v. Morrison, 246 A.D.2d 634, 667 N.Y.S.2d 312; Walker v. Weinstock, 213 A.D.2d 631, 624 N.Y.S.2d 193).
However, we reject the Hospital's contention that the Supreme Court improperly entered judgment in favor of Aziz based upon the prior stipulation. As Aziz contended, the stipulation provided that he was to recover the principal sum of $300,000, plus interest, in the event the Hospital's claim against him was dismissed. Since that claim was dismissed by this court in Robinson v. Jewish Hosp. and Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn, 275 A.D.2d 362, 712 N.Y.S.2d 585, Aziz was entitled to the entry of a judgment in that amount (see Teitelbaum Holdings v. Gold, 48 N.Y.2d 51, 56, 421 N.Y.S.2d 556, 396 N.E.2d 1029; Aaron v. Aaron, 2 A.D.3d 942, 768 N.Y.S.2d 739; Transportation House v. E.D.V. Maintenance Corp., 84 A.D.2d 534, 535, 443 N.Y.S.2d 168).
The Hospital's remaining contentions are without merit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 25, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)