Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Vincent MARTIN, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Washington Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
At the conclusion of a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit refusing a direct order, creating a disturbance, leaving an assigned area without authorization, possessing tools without authorization, and harassment. This CPLR article 78 proceeding was commenced following an unsuccessful administrative appeal.
The misbehavior report and the hearing testimony of the other inmates involved in the incident provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Binns v. Goord, 12 A.D.3d 1006, 1007, 784 N.Y.S.2d 907 [2006]; Matter of Concepcion v. Miller, 247 A.D.2d 695, 695-696, 672 N.Y.S.2d 261 [1998] ). Petitioner's contention that the misbehavior report is deficient because it did not state the specific role he played in the incident is without merit inasmuch as the misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed to apprise petitioner of the charges against him and to enable him to prepare a defense (see 7 NYCRR 251-3.1[c]; Matter of Torres v. Goord, 261 A.D.2d 759, 759, 691 N.Y.S.2d 210 [1999]; Matter of Couch v. Goord, 255 A.D.2d 720, 721-722, 682 N.Y.S.2d 106 [1998] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions were not properly preserved for this Court's review.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 15, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)