Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Carlos FALERO, Petitioner, v. Glenn GOORD, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was found guilty of using a controlled substance in violation of a prison disciplinary rule after petitioner's urine specimen twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. We reject petitioner's contention that he was prevented from preparing a proper defense because his request for the daily worksheets and daily log relating to the drug-testing procedure was denied. The documents requested merely contained background information pertaining to the preliminary calibration procedure and identification and expiration of the reagents used (see, Matter of Sweet v. Coughlin, 161 A.D.2d 1005, 1005-1006, 558 N.Y.S.2d 198), which was set forth in the urinalysis procedure forms (see, Matter of Benton v. Coombe, 242 A.D.2d 763, 662 N.Y.S.2d 276). In any event, petitioner procured a copy of the daily log and daily worksheets from another source and relied on them during the hearing.
The misbehavior report and positive results of the two urinalysis tests provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Lahey v. Kelly, 71 N.Y.2d 135, 524 N.Y.S.2d 30, 518 N.E.2d 924). The record fails to support petitioner's contention that the result of the hearing was affected by any alleged bias on the part of the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Harrison v. Selsky, 198 A.D.2d 728, 729, 604 N.Y.S.2d 615). To the extent that petitioner's remaining contentions are preserved for our review, we find them to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 10, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)