Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: James GILES, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit violent conduct, attempted assault on a staff member, interference with an employee and refusing to obey a direct order. The misbehavior report related that petitioner was being escorted to the shower room by two correction officers when he attempted to strike one of them with a bar of soap clutched in his fist. The two officers endeavored to restrain petitioner but he refused to stop struggling until he was manacled.
The misbehavior report and eyewitness testimony of both correction officers provided substantial evidence of guilt (see, Matter of Daum v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 715, 716, 711 N.Y.S.2d 212; Matter of Odom v. Goord, 271 A.D.2d 792, 707 N.Y.S.2d 248). That petitioner's testimony related a contrary version of the events in question raised an issue of credibility that was appropriately resolved by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Garnette v. Goord, 270 A.D.2d 536, 703 N.Y.S.2d 759). Petitioner's claims of Hearing Officer bias and the alleged violation of his right to call witnesses and present documentary evidence have been reviewed and found to be without merit (see, Matter of Shaird v. Selsky, 268 A.D.2d 721, 702 N.Y.S.2d 664; Matter of Williams v. Coombe, 238 A.D.2d 809, 657 N.Y.S.2d 363, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 806, 663 N.Y.S.2d 512, 686 N.E.2d 224).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 18, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)