Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Shawn JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Glenn GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit fighting, assault on an inmate and violent conduct. The charges arose out of an incident that occurred in July 2000, when petitioner allegedly ordered and supervised an attack perpetrated on a fellow inmate who was beaten and stabbed by three other inmates. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented at the disciplinary hearing in the form of the misbehavior report, testimony given by the correction officer who wrote the report and a confidential statement provided by an inmate informant who had identified petitioner from a photo array as the instigator of the attack. Our in camera review of the record discloses that the Hearing Officer made an independent assessment to determine that the informant was reliable and credible (see, Matter of Abdur-Raheem v.. Mann, 85 N.Y.2d 113, 123, 623 N.Y.S.2d 758, 647 N.E.2d 1266; Matter of Vega v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 807, 808, 712 N.Y.S.2d 78).
We conclude that there is a sufficient evidentiary basis upon which to confirm the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Vega v. Goord, supra, at 807, 712 N.Y.S.2d 78; Matter of Torres v. Goord, 242 A.D.2d 800, 661 N.Y.S.2d 1016). That the testimony given by petitioner and two of the inmates accused of carrying out the attack was at variance with the factual accounts given by other hearing witnesses presented an issue of credibility that was appropriately resolved by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Melendez v. Goord, 285 A.D.2d 782, 783, 727 N.Y.S.2d 206, 207; Matter of Soto v. Goord, 275 A.D.2d 872, 873, 713 N.Y.S.2d 777). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 25, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)