Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Anthony WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Following an incident in which petitioner asked a female correction officer to accompany him to an office where he gave her a religious book, he was charged in a misbehavior report with solicitation, stalking and harassment. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the charge of harassment and the determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
Upon reviewing this record, we do not find that substantial evidence supports the determination at issue. The female officer admitted that she had had conversations with petitioner in the past concerning religion, and petitioner testified that, based upon these conversations, he decided to give her the book as a gift. Although the officer testified that petitioner exhibited an “eerie” smile which she found “very unnerving,” she did not indicate that he engaged in any inappropriate or disrespectful behavior and she confirmed that he had always addressed her professionally in the past. Petitioner's conduct appears to have been a continuation of a cordial relationship between the officer and petitioner.
Under these circumstances, we cannot conclude that it rose to the level of harassment as contemplated by 7 NYCRR 270.2(B)(8)(ii) (see e.g. Matter of Costantino v. Goord, 38 A.D.3d 659, 660, 831 N.Y.S.2d 538 [2007]; Matter of Royster v. Goord, 26 A.D.3d 503, 504, 810 N.Y.S.2d 212 [2006]; compare Matter of Richards v. Kuhlmann, 251 A.D.2d 939, 939-940, 675 N.Y.S.2d 174 [1998] ). Accordingly, the determination must be annulled. Given our disposition, we need not address petitioner's remaining claims.
ADJUDGED that the determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted and the Commissioner of Correctional Services is directed to expunge all references to this matter from petitioner's institutional record.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 14, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)