Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Luigi IZZO, et al., Appellants, v. AEW CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, Defendant, Esteridge Properties Corp., Defendant-Respondent, Starwood Hotels & Resorts, Defendant Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Hudson Shatz Ptg. Co., Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered October 19, 2000, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action predicated upon Labor Law § 240(1) insofar as asserted against the defendants Esteridge Properties Corp. and Starwood Hotels & Resorts.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, and the motion is granted.
The Supreme Court improperly denied the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action predicated upon Labor Law § 240(1) insofar as asserted against the defendants Esteridge Properties Corp. and Starwood Hotels & Resorts (hereinafter the defendants). Since the injured plaintiff demonstrated that he fell from an improperly-placed ladder, he established a prima facie violation of Labor Law § 240(1) (see, Martinsen v. County of Nassau, 249 A.D.2d 519, 671 N.Y.S.2d 355; Skalko v. Marshall's Inc., 229 A.D.2d 569, 646 N.Y.S.2d 140; Whalen v. F.J. Sciame Constr. Co., 198 A.D.2d 501, 604 N.Y.S.2d 174). The defendants did not oppose the motion, and the third-party defendants did not raise a triable issue of fact in opposition. Even if the injured plaintiff's act of stretching from the ladder constituted a misuse of the ladder, the misuse was caused by the improper placement of the ladder. Since the improper placement of the ladder was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries, the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment should have been granted (see, Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, 65 N.Y.2d 513, 493 N.Y.S.2d 102, 482 N.E.2d 898).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 13, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)