Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Caryn ANDREANI, Appellant. HPP Rinx, Inc., Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 26, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant worked as a general ledger bookkeeper for the employer for nearly one year. Toward the close of the employer's fiscal year, she obtained payroll information, to which she would not have otherwise have had access, by falsely representing to a vice-president that she needed it in connection with a project that she was working on for the company's accountant. She then used the information to make accusations that another employee was cheating the company by receiving compensation for hours she did not work, which accusations proved to be unfounded. The employer found claimant to be untrustworthy and terminated her employment. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently ruled that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated for misconduct. Claimant now appeals.
We affirm. “An employee's apparent dishonesty has been held to constitute disqualifying misconduct” (Matter of Whaley [Commissioner of Labor], 38 A.D.3d 1084, 1085, 831 N.Y.S.2d 775 [2007] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Bender [Olums of Binghamton, Inc.-Commissioner of Labor], 36 A.D.3d 1041, 1042, 826 N.Y.S.2d 843 [2007] ). Here, significant proof was adduced that claimant obtained access to restricted information under false pretenses and for an ulterior purpose. Claimant's denial of wrongdoing and exculpatory explanation for her conduct presented a question of credibility for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Bender [Olums of Binghamton, Inc.-Commissioner of Labor], 36 A.D.3d at 1042, 826 N.Y.S.2d 843; Matter of Fulcher [Commissioner of Labor], 32 A.D.3d 1064, 1064-1065, 820 N.Y.S.2d 664 [2006] ). Inasmuch as substantial evidence supports the Board's decision, we decline to disturb it.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 25, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)