Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Estate of Burdette L. GREENWAY, Deceased. Thomas D. Greenway et al., Appellants; Lucille P. Beebee, Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Surrogate's Court of Tompkins County (Barrett, S.), entered October 22, 1996, which dismissed petitioners' application to revoke letters of administration which were granted to respondent.
On March 25, 1996, decedent died intestate leaving no surviving spouse or children. Letters of administration were granted by Surrogate's Court to respondent, decedent's mother. Petitioners are decedent's brother and also decedent's long-time companion, who alleges that she is a creditor of the estate. Petitioners commenced this proceeding seeking to revoke the letters of administration contending, inter alia, that respondent was incompetent and disqualified to act as the fiduciary because she had abandoned decedent as a child (see, SCPA 711; EPTL 4-1.4) and also made false statements in her petition for letters of administration. Respondent denied the allegations in her answer and raised various affirmative defenses. Thereafter, respondent moved to dismiss the petition based on her defense that necessary parties had not been joined. Petitioners opposed the motion and cross-moved pursuant to SCPA 711 and 712 to suspend respondent as the fiduciary pending an evidentiary hearing. Respondent opposed the cross motion on the merits. Surrogate's Court, without addressing the motion to dismiss for failure to join necessary parties, dismissed the petition and affirmed the prior issuance of the letters of administration. Petitioners appeal.
In our view, Surrogate's Court acted prematurely in dismissing the petition without an evidentiary hearing. While it is not necessary for Surrogate's Court to conduct a hearing in cases where facts are undisputed, “[w]here * * * the respondent interposes an answer which denies a material fact contained in the petition and no motion is made to dismiss [for failure to state a cause of action], the Surrogate must conduct a hearing” (2 Cox-Arenson-Medina, N.Y. Civ Prac, Surrogate's Court Procedure Act § 713.02, at 7-209; see, Matter of Burns' Estate, 1 A.D.2d 505, 507, 151 N.Y.S.2d 986; Matter of McDonald's Estate, 160 A.D. 86, 87, 145 N.Y.S. 267, affd 211 N.Y. 272, 105 N.E. 407; see also, Matter of Thieriot, 188 N.Y. 589, 81 N.E. 1177). Although the proof was sufficient for Surrogate's Court to deny petitioners' request to temporarily suspend respondent as the fiduciary, the record, under the circumstances herein, was insufficient to finally determine the factual issues presented on the merits.
ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as dismissed the petition on the merits; matter remitted to Surrogate's Court of Tompkins County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court's decision; and, as so modified, affirmed.
CARDONA, Presiding Justice.
MERCURE, WHITE, CASEY and CARPINELLO, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 17, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)