Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ASSOCIATES HOME EQUITY SERVICES, INC., etc., et al., respondents, v. Regina GAMBELLA, appellant, et al., defendants.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Regina Gambella appeals from an amended judgment of foreclosure and sale of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), entered June 23, 2005, which, upon an order of the same court dated May 9, 2005, inter alia, added Option One Mortgage Corp. to the caption as a defendant and directed the referee to sell the mortgaged premises subject to the superior mortgage held by Option One Mortgage Corp.
ORDERED that the appeal from the amended judgment of foreclosure and sale is dismissed, with costs.
As a general rule, we do not consider an issue on a subsequent appeal which was raised or could have been raised in an earlier appeal which was dismissed for lack of prosecution (see Rubeo v. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 93 N.Y.2d 750, 697 N.Y.S.2d 866, 720 N.E.2d 86; Bray v. Cox, 38 N.Y.2d 350, 379 N.Y.S.2d 803, 342 N.E.2d 575). The defendant Regina Gambella appealed from the order dated May 9, 2005, which, inter alia, granted the motion of the defendant Option One Mortgage Corp. for leave to intervene as of right, but that appeal was dismissed by decision and order on motion of this court dated February 10, 2006, for failure to prosecute. We decline to exercise our discretion to determine the merits of the instant appeal, which raises the same issue as could have been raised on the appeal from the order which was dismissed for lack of prosecution (see Gihon, LLC v. 501 Second St., LLC, 29 A.D.3d 630, 814 N.Y.S.2d 729; Hepner v. New York City Tr. Auth., 27 A.D.3d 418, 419, 810 N.Y.S.2d 663).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 22, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)