Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Michael ARONOV, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. BRUINS TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al., Defendants, SGS Travelscope, Inc., Appellant, First Equipment Finance Corp., etc., et al., Defendants-Respondents.
In consolidated actions to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, the defendant SGS Travelscope, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated October 24, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
On December 24, 1998, a bus en route from Brooklyn to Atlantic City, New Jersey, with 22 passengers on board spun out of control on the Garden State Parkway, causing the death of eight passengers and injury to the other 14 passengers and the driver. The driver was employed by the defendant Bruins Transportation, Inc. (hereinafter Bruins), the lessee of the bus. The defendant SGS Travelscope, Inc. (hereinafter SGS) was the travel agent which retained Bruins for the Atlantic City bus trip.
SGS established its entitlement to summary judgment. “Where tour participants are transported by an independent contractor, the tour operator is not responsible for an accident which occurs due to the negligence of the independent contractor” (Cohen v. Heritage Motor Tours, 205 A.D.2d 105, 107, 618 N.Y.S.2d 387; see Lowy v. Heimann's Bus Tours, 240 A.D.2d 548, 658 N.Y.S.2d 452; Dorkin v. American Express Co., 43 A.D.2d 877, 351 N.Y.S.2d 190). Here, the tour bus was owned and operated by an independent contractor. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact that SGS's advertisements constituted a holding out to the public which would estop it from disclaiming liability for the alleged negligence of Bruins (cf. Rovinsky v. Hispanidad Holidays, 180 A.D.2d 673, 580 N.Y.S.2d 49).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 30, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)