Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Elizabeth BURGALETA, respondent-appellant, v. Eugene BURGALETA, appellant-respondent.
In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated August 22, 1997, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated May 11, 2007, as, upon vacating the parties' stipulations regarding child support, denied his motion to transfer a pending Family Court proceeding to the Supreme Court, and transferred the matter back to the Family Court to determine his proper child support obligation, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from the same order.
ORDERED that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned (see 22 NYCRR 670.8 [e] [1] ), without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant failed to establish that the Family Court Support Magistrate assigned to this matter exhibited bias against him or a disregard for the law, so as to warrant a transfer of the matter to the Supreme Court (see generally Schwartzberg v. Kingsbridge Hgts. Care Ctr., Inc., 28 A.D.3d 465, 813 N.Y.S.2d 191; Spector v. Spector, 18 A.D.3d 380, 797 N.Y.S.2d 437; Anonymous v. Anonymous, 287 A.D.2d 306, 731 N.Y.S.2d 365; Matter of Storch v. Storch, 282 A.D.2d 845, 725 N.Y.S.2d 399; Matter of Murdock v. Murdock, 183 A.D.2d 769, 583 N.Y.S.2d 501).
Given the Supreme Court's vacatur of the parties' original child support stipulations for failure to comply with Domestic Relations Law § 240(1-b)(h) (see Matter of Victorio v. McBratney, 32 A.D.3d 962, 821 N.Y.S.2d 262; Warnecke v. Warnecke, 12 A.D.3d 502, 784 N.Y.S.2d 631), and its transfer of the matter to the Family Court Support Magistrate for a new determination as to child support, the Support Magistrate should consider all relevant circumstances in fixing the new award of child support (see Matter of Williams v. Chapman, 22 A.D.3d 1015, 803 N.Y.S.2d 260; Matter of O'Connor v. Curcio, 281 A.D.2d 100, 724 N.Y.S.2d 171).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 20, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)