Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: DIANE H. (Anonymous). Seaman's Society for Children and Families, et al., respondents; Matthew H. (Anonymous), Sr., et al., appellants. (Proceeding No. 1). In the Matter of Missy H. (Anonymous). Seaman's Society for Children and Families, et al., respondents; Matthew H. (Anonymous), Sr., et al., appellants. (Proceeding No. 2). In the Matter of Alexya H. (Anonymous). Seaman's Society for Children and Families, et al., respondents; Matthew H. (Anonymous), Sr., et al., appellants. (Proceeding No. 3). In the Matter of Jose H. (Anonymous). Seaman's Society for Children and Families, et al., respondents; Matthew H. (Anonymous), Sr., et al., appellants. (Proceeding No. 4). In the Matter of Matthew H. (Anonymous), Jr. Seaman's Society for Children and Families, et al., respondents; Matthew H. (Anonymous), Sr., et al., appellants. (Proceeding No. 5).
In five related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights by reason of severe abuse, the father appeals, and the mother separately appeals, from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Richmond County (Porzio, J.), dated August 22, 2003, which, after a fact-finding hearing, and upon findings that they had severely abused the children, inter alia, terminated their parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the children to the Seaman's Society for Children and Families and the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing supports, by clear and convincing evidence, the Family Court's finding as to the mother's severe abuse pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b(8)(a). Contrary to the mother's contention, the petitioner was not required to demonstrate “diligent efforts” to strengthen the parental relationship before the Family Court could terminate her parental rights. The Family Court previously determined that reasonable efforts would not make it possible for the child to return safely to the home, and thus there was no need to show diligent efforts to reunite the family (see Social Services § 384-b(8)(a)(iv); Matter of Marino S., 293 A.D.2d 223, 741 N.Y.S.2d 207, affd. 100 N.Y.2d 361, 763 N.Y.S.2d 796, 795 N.E.2d 21, cert. denied 540 U.S. 1059, 124 S.Ct. 834, 157 L.Ed.2d 714).
We have reviewed the record and agree with the father's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on his appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel to the father is granted (see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493; People v. Vasquez, 70 N.Y.2d 1, 516 N.Y.S.2d 921, 509 N.E.2d 934; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631, 387 N.Y.S.2d 399; cf. People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606, 419 N.Y.S.2d 913, 393 N.E.2d 987).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 29, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)