Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: James NUGENT, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits.
Petitioner, a highway general foreman, applied for accidental disability retirement benefits because of injuries he allegedly sustained to his neck, back and arms after being attacked by a co-worker. Petitioner's application was denied on the ground that he was not permanently incapacitated from performing his employment duties. Substantial evidence supports the determination. Sherwood Greiner, an orthopedic surgeon who examined petitioner and testified as an expert on behalf of respondent State and Local Employees' Retirement System, opined that petitioner's subjective complaints of pain were inconsistent with the medical findings. It was Greiner's opinion that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from the performance of his employment duties. While petitioner presented medical testimony to the contrary, it is within respondent Comptroller's authority to evaluate conflicting medical evidence and to accept one medical expert's opinion over that of another (see, Matter of Senecal v. McCall, 252 A.D.2d 630, 675 N.Y.S.2d 225). Furthermore, the record fails to support petitioner's contention that he was denied a fair hearing, notwithstanding the fact that the Hearing Officer accepted the proposed findings of fact and conclusion of law of respondents' counsel.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 05, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)