Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PLATINUM RX, LLC, respondent, v. Albert C. POSE, et al., appellants.
In an action, inter alia, to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendants Albert C. Pose and Bryan J. Holzberg appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rosenberg, J.), dated June 27, 2005, which, among other things, granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for leave to enter judgment against them upon their default in answering the complaint, and the defendant Troy Holdings, LLC, separately appeals from the same order.
ORDERED that the appeal by the defendant Troy Holdings, LLC, is dismissed as abandoned, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[e] ); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the defendants Albert C. Pose and Bryan J. Holzberg; and it is further,
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff payable by the defendants Albert C. Pose and Bryan J. Holzberg.
To successfully oppose that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for leave to enter judgment based upon the failure to answer the complaint, the defendants Albert C. Pose and Bryan J. Holzberg (hereinafter the defendants), were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default and a meritorious defense (see Thompson v. Steuben Realty Corp., 18 A.D.3d 864, 864-865, 795 N.Y.S.2d 470; Freulich-Woodruff v. B.A. Auto Repair, 14 A.D.3d 593, 787 N.Y.S.2d 886; Dinstber v. Fludd, 2 A.D.3d 670, 671, 768 N.Y.S.2d 633). The defendants failed to satisfy either requirement. Therefore, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for leave to enter judgment against the defendants upon their default in answering the complaint.
The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 11, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)