Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: V. Robert ROACH, Petitioner, v. H. Carl McCALL, as Comptroller of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits.
Petitioner was employed as the head bus driver by the Town of Webb Union Free School District from 1969 until his retirement in August 1996 at the age of 62. At that time, petitioner applied for accidental disability retirement benefits, claiming that his right shoulder had been injured as the result of employment-related accidents in 1985, 1995 and 1996, which had incapacitated him from performing the duties performed by a head bus driver. Respondent Comptroller denied petitioner's application on the ground that, inter alia, petitioner's condition did not result from employment-related accidents.
At the hearing that ensued, John Cambareri, a board-certified orthopedic surgeon testifying on behalf of respondent State and Local Employees' Retirement System, opined that petitioner's disability was the result of traumatic arthritis in his right shoulder stemming from a shoulder dislocation suffered by petitioner as a teenager. Although petitioner's expert medical witnesses testified to the contrary, it lies within the exclusive authority of the Comptroller to evaluate divergent medical opinions in the process of determining whether a claimant is entitled to accidental disability retirement benefits (see, Matter of De Carolis v. McCall, 272 A.D.2d 824, 825, 708 N.Y.S.2d 192; Matter of Giebner v. McCall, 270 A.D.2d 705, 706, 704 N.Y.S.2d 720). We conclude that the determination under review is supported by the requisite substantial evidence; hence, it will not be disturbed.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 21, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)