Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jamie G. THORNTON, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered April 15, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree.
In satisfaction of an indictment charging him with murder in the second degree in connection with the shooting death of his adoptive father, defendant pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the first degree; as a part of the plea he waived his right to appeal, reserving the right to challenge the propriety of the sentence imposed. Before being sentenced, defendant moved to withdraw his plea on the ground that extenuating circumstances existed, to wit, years of sexual abuse inflicted upon him by his adoptive father. County Court denied defendant's motion and sentenced him to a prison term of 12 to 24 years.
Our review of the record reveals no abuse of discretion in County Court's denial of defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, CPL 220.60[3] ). The record discloses that defendant was apprised of the fact that by pleading guilty he was giving up his right to a trial and all rights in connection therewith, which would include a defense of any alleged sexual abuse (see, People v. Kalvaitis, 238 A.D.2d 756, 757-758, 656 N.Y.S.2d 975, 976; People v. Castro, 175 A.D.2d 953, 573 N.Y.S.2d 531, lv. denied 79 N.Y.2d 825, 580 N.Y.S.2d 206, 588 N.E.2d 104). Furthermore, before entering a knowing and voluntary guilty plea, defendant was advised by defense counsel, with whose services defendant was satisfied, of the consequences thereof (see, People v. Hudson, 237 A.D.2d 759, 655 N.Y.S.2d 142). In addition, defense counsel's failure to join in defendant's pro se motion to withdraw his plea did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel under these circumstances (see, People v. Hayes, 194 A.D.2d 998, 599 N.Y.S.2d 679). Finally, we conclude that the sentence was not unduly harsh given the favorable plea bargain and, accordingly, we find no reason to disturb it.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 11, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)