Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Maurice STATON, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), imposed November 14, 1995, upon his conviction of attempted murder in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree (two counts), assault in the first degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, the sentence being indeterminate terms of 6 to 12 years imprisonment for attempted murder in the second degree and 4 to 12 years imprisonment for attempted robbery in the first degree (two counts) and assault in the first degree (two counts), and a determinate term of one year imprisonment for criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, with all terms to run concurrently.
ORDERED that the sentence is modified, on the law, by reducing the term of imprisonment imposed for attempted murder in the second degree from an indeterminate term of 6 to 12 years imprisonment to an indeterminate term of 4 to 12 years imprisonment; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed.
The People correctly concede that because the crime of attempted murder in the second degree does not meet the definition of an armed violent felony (see, CPL 1.20[41] ), the Supreme Court erred in imposing a minimum term of imprisonment which was one-half of the maximum term for that count (see, Penal Law former § 70.02[4]; People v. Pride, 173 A.D.2d 651, 570 N.Y.S.2d 227). We have remedied the illegality by reducing the minimum term of imprisonment (see, People v. Hoppie, 220 A.D.2d 528, 632 N.Y.S.2d 33), and we find no merit to the defendant's contention that the resulting sentence of 4 to 12 years imprisonment is harsh or excessive (see, People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 475 N.Y.S.2d 351).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 29, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)