Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Marivell MARMOL, appellant, v. NORTH ISLE VILLAGE, INC., respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated September 18, 2006, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.
The plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell on ice and snow while walking on a well-worn path in order to reach the parking lot outside her residence. Although there was a cement walkway leading from the plaintiff's residence to the parking lot, the plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that there was a vehicle parked at the very end of the walkway, and that the defendant, which owned the premises, was negligent “in allowing cars to park at the ingress/egress area where the sidewalk meets the parking lot.” The plaintiff further claimed that she used the well-worn path only because she could not safely get around the car obstructing access from the cement walkway to the parking lot.
While the defendant established, prima facie, that the cement walkway leading to the parking lot had been kept clear of ice and snow, it made no attempt to refute the plaintiff's claim that it was negligent in allowing cars to park directly in front of the walkway, thereby preventing residents from safely using the walkway to reach the parking lot (cf. Carthans v. Grenadier Realty Corp., 38 A.D.3d 489, 832 N.Y.S.2d 234; Malley v. Alice Hyde Hosp. Assn., 297 A.D.2d 425, 746 N.Y.S.2d 102; Morris v. Nacmias, 245 A.D.2d 432, 666 N.Y.S.2d 202).
On the facts presented, the defendant failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Ayotte v. Gervasio, 81 N.Y.2d 1062, 601 N.Y.S.2d 463, 619 N.E.2d 400; Carthans v. Grenadier Realty Corp., 38 A.D.3d 489, 832 N.Y.S.2d 234). Therefore, the motion should have been denied, and we need not consider the sufficiency of the papers submitted by the plaintiff in opposition.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 26, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)