Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Joseph SIMON, respondent, v. NORTRAX N.E., LLC, et al., defendants, A. Montano Company, Inc., appellant.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant A. Montano Company, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), entered August 17, 2006, as denied that branch of its motion which was “for a declaration that this action was commenced on September 21, 2005.”
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
“The courts of New York do not issue advisory opinions for the fundamental reason that in this State ‘[t]he giving of such opinions is not the exercise of the judicial function’ ” (Cuomo v. Long Is. Light. Co., 71 N.Y.2d 349, 354, 525 N.Y.S.2d 828, 520 N.E.2d 546, quoting Matter of State Indus. Commn., 224 N.Y. 13, 16, 119 N.E. 1027). Thus, courts may not issue judicial decisions which “can have no immediate effect and may never resolve anything” (New York Pub. Interest Research Group v. Carey, 42 N.Y.2d 527, 531, 399 N.Y.S.2d 621, 369 N.E.2d 1155). Here, the appellant moved, inter alia, for a declaration that this action was commenced on September 21, 2005, to determine the viability of a potential defense based upon the enactment of the Transportation Equity Act of 2005 (49 USCA § 30106), which went into effect on August 10, 2005. Under these circumstances, that branch of the appellant's motion which was for an order declaring the date of commencement of the action constituted, in essence, an impermissible request for an advisory opinion. Since the appellant was not entitled to such relief, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of its motion.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 30, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)