Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Robert MORETTI, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting illicit drug use. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty as charged. Upon administrative review, the determination was affirmed with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. Substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report, positive urinalysis test results and related documentation and testimony adduced at the hearing supports the determination of guilt (see Matter of Crosby v. Goord, 38 A.D.3d 1110, 1110, 833 N.Y.S.2d 674 [2007]; Matter of Hoover v. Goord, 38 A.D.3d 1069, 1070, 831 N.Y.S.2d 602 [2007], lv. denied 8 N.Y.3d 816, 839 N.Y.S.2d 455, 870 N.E.2d 696 [2007] ). As for petitioner's assertion that he was deprived of adequate employee assistance, any defects in the assistance provided to him were cured by the Hearing Officer at the time of the hearing (see Matter of Ellison v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 800, 801, 711 N.Y.S.2d 573 [2000] ). We have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that he was improperly denied the right to present evidence, there were deficiencies in the chain of custody and the Hearing Officer was biased, and find them to be unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 13, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)