Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
James NAPOLI, etc., et al., Respondents, v. MOUNT ALVERNIA, INC., etc., et al., Appellants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Mount Alvernia, Inc., a/k/a Camp Alvernia, and Kurt Buckholz separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated August 1, 1996, which denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendants' motions for summary judgment are granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The plaintiff James Napoli and the defendant Kurt Buckholz were both children attending a summer camp run by the defendant Mount Alvernia, Inc., a/k/a Camp Alvernia. On July 8, 1990, Napoli and Buckholz were both going to participate in a game of softball. Before the start of the game, Buckholz swung a bat on the sidelines, somewhere between home plate and third base, and inadvertently hit Napoli in the jaw with the bat.
“Pursuant to the doctrine of assumption of risk, an injured party may not seek compensation for injuries incurred as the consequence of some risk or danger usually associated with a pursuit voluntarily undertaken. Thus, when it is shown indisputably that a particular injury was caused by a condition or practice which is common to a particular sport (see, e.g., Turcotte v. Fell, 68 N.Y.2d 432, 510 N.Y.S.2d 49, 502 N.E.2d 964), summary judgment is warranted” (Cuesta v. Immaculate Conception R.C. Church, 168 A.D.2d 411, 562 N.Y.S.2d 537). Here, the injury was incurred as the result of a danger inherent in the game of baseball, the danger associated with people swinging bats on the sidelines while warming up for the game. Thus, the defendants' motions for summary judgment should have been granted.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 05, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)