Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Joshua WEISS, et al., appellants, v. Mark SPITZER, et al., defendants; Robert P. Baron, nonparty-respondent.
In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated September 25, 2006, which granted the motion of their attorney, inter alia, for leave to withdraw as counsel.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
An attorney may be permitted to withdraw from employment where a client refuses to pay reasonable legal fees (see Winters v. Winters, 25 A.D.3d 601, 602, 807 N.Y.S.2d 302; Kay v. Kay, 245 A.D.2d 549, 550, 666 N.Y.S.2d 728; Stephen Eldridge Realty Corp. v. Green, 174 A.D.2d 564, 565, 570 N.Y.S.2d 677). Here, the record establishes that the plaintiffs were almost $3,000 in arrears in payment of their legal fees, which they had promised to pay within 10 days of billing pursuant to a retainer agreement. Moreover, the plaintiffs accused their attorney of incompetence and did not dispute that he no longer maintains an office in New York. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion, inter alia, for leave to withdraw as the plaintiffs' counsel (see Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 2-110[C][1][d], [f] [22 NYCRR 1200.15(c)(1)(iv) and (vi) ]; Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-110[C][6] [22 NYCRR 1200.15(c)(6) ]; Galvano v. Galvano, 193 A.D.2d 779, 780, 598 N.Y.S.2d 268).
The plaintiffs' remaining contentions either are without merit or have been rendered academic by our determination.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 11, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)