Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
William J. DiTOLLA, etc., appellant, v. DORAL DENTAL IPA OF NEW YORK, LLC, et al., respondents.
In a class action for an accounting, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), entered March 2, 2007, which granted the defendants' motion to compel arbitration.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants' motion to compel arbitration is denied.
In February 2006 the plaintiff, Dr. William J. DiTolla, commenced this class action seeking an accounting to determine if the defendants had mismanaged funds owed him and members of the class. According to the complaint, the plaintiff and class members had entered into an agreement with the defendants whereby the plaintiff and other dentists agreed to provide dental services to certain individuals who are insured by Medicaid and the defendants agreed to pay the dentists according to a defined fee schedule. The Supreme Court granted the defendants' motion to compel arbitration of the plaintiff's accounting claim in accordance with the arbitration clause in the parties' agreement. We reverse.
Contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, the arbitration clause in the parties' agreement, by its express terms, does not encompass a claim for an accounting. The arbitration clause applies only to “a dispute regarding payment ․ involving a contention by one party that the other has failed to perform its obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement.” This is solely an action for an accounting. The complaint contains no specific allegations of any wrongdoing on behalf of the defendants, and no damages are sought (see generally Matter of A.F.C.O. Metals [Local Union 580 of Intl. Assn. of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, AFL-CIO ], 87 N.Y.2d 222, 226, 638 N.Y.S.2d 585, 661 N.E.2d 1365; Matter of Waldron [Goddess ], 61 N.Y.2d 181, 183, 473 N.Y.S.2d 136, 461 N.E.2d 273; see also Goldstein v. Doral Dental Serv. of PA, 2004 WL 2979757 [PA Ct. of Common Pleas 2004] ). Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court erred in granting the defendants' motion to compel arbitration.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 07, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)