Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
A & S TRUCKING SERVICE, INC., et al., claimants, v. NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY, defendant. (Claim No. 1)
Frederick Schaefer, claimant, v. New York State Thruway Authority, defendant third-party claimant-respondent; Continental Casualty Insurance Company, third-party defendant-appellant. (Claim No. 6) (and four other titles)
In related claims, inter alia, to recover damages for injury to property and a third-party claim in Claim No. 6 for a judgment declaring the rights of the parties under certain insurance policies, Continental Casualty Insurance Company, the third-party defendant in Claim No. 6, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims (King, J.), dated November 27, 1998, which, after a nonjury trial, declared that it was obligated to provide a defense to the defendant third-party claimant New York State Thruway Authority in the main claims.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The determination of a trial court after a nonjury trial should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is not supported by legally sufficient evidence or could not have been reached by any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Greenberg v. Behlen, 220 A.D.2d 720, 633 N.Y.S.2d 189). The evidence here is legally sufficient to support the determination that the appellant was equitably estopped from denying coverage to the defendant third-party plaintiff. Further, the determination was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Brooklyn Hosp. Ctr. v. Centennial Ins. Co., 258 A.D.2d 491, 685 N.Y.S.2d 267; Indemnity Ins. Co. of N. Am. v. Charter Oak Ins. Co., 235 A.D.2d 521, 653 N.Y.S.2d 135).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 24, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)