Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jonathan V. POLLACK (Admitted as Jonathan Vogel Pollack), an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law, Resignor.
Resignation tendered pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.9 by Jonathan V. Pollack, who was admitted to the practice of law on June 22, 1960, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Jonathan Vogel Pollack.
Jonathan V. Pollack has submitted an affidavit dated November 11, 1996, wherein he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law (22 NYCRR 691.9). Mr. Pollack was admitted to the practice of law by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on June 22, 1960, under the name Jonathan Vogel Pollack.
Mr. Pollack avers that he is currently the subject of a pending investigation by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District and that the Grievance Committee would seek authorization from the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department to prosecute a disciplinary proceeding against him based on those charges. Mr. Pollack acknowledges his misconduct in representing an estate in the sale of real property. It was agreed that Mr. Pollack would retain the down payment of $13,300 to pay the estate taxes of $8,246.25 and other estate expenses. He admittedly used estate funds to pay mortgage arrears to avoid foreclosure on his own home.
Mr. Pollack acknowledges that he could not successfully defend himself on the merits against any disciplinary charges based upon these facts. He avers that his resignation is freely and voluntarily tendered and that he has not been subjected to coercion or duress by anyone. Mr. Pollack is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation, including the fact that he is barred from seeking reinstatement for at least seven years.
The proffered resignation indicates Mr. Pollack's awareness that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(6-a), an order permitting him to resign could direct him to make monetary restitution to any persons whose money or property was misappropriated or misapplied or to reimburse the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York for same. Finally, the respondent acknowledges his awareness that any order issued pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(6-a) could be entered as a civil judgment against him and he specifically waives the opportunity to be heard in opposition thereto.
Grievance Counsel recommends that the Court accept the proffered resignation. Under the circumstances, the resignation of Jonathan V. Pollack is accepted and directed to be filed. Accordingly, Jonathan V. Pollack is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.
ORDERED that the resignation of Jonathan V. Pollack is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, Jonathan V. Pollack is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
ORDERED that Jonathan V. Pollack shall promptly comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, Jonathan V. Pollack is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(6-a)(a), (b), and (e), Jonathan V. Pollack is directed to make restitution in the amount of $12,100 to the Estate of Helen Hoppe, less the amount of any awards to the Estate by the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York arising out of the respondent's misappropriation or misapplication, without prejudice to any further restitution which may be found due.
PER CURIAM.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 13, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)