Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Alicia Beth FALK, respondent, v. Mark Charles OWEN, appellant.
In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Edlitz, J.), entered August 24, 2004, as, in effect, confirmed an order of the same court (Furman, S.M.), entered July 27, 2004, which, after a hearing, found that he willfully failed to obey an order of support of the same court (Furman, S.M.), entered February 13, 2004, and thereupon held him in civil contempt of court.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The father's failure to pay child support as ordered constituted “prima facie evidence of a willful violation” of the Family Court's February 13, 2004, order of support (Family Ct. Act § 454[3][a] ). The burden then shifted to the father “to offer competent, credible evidence of his inability to comply with that order” (Matter of Watson v. Watson, 21 A.D.3d 497, 498, 799 N.Y.S.2d 809; see Matter of Powers v. Powers, 86 N.Y.2d 63, 69-70, 629 N.Y.S.2d 984, 653 N.E.2d 1154). The father admitted that in January 2004 he voluntarily left his job in Westchester County and moved to Otsego County, where he obtained employment at less than half the salary he had been earning in Westchester County. The father's assertion that he felt obliged to relocate in order to care for his 60-year-old mother, who had back problems that required surgery, did not constitute sufficient proof that the change in his financial circumstances was unavoidable, and was especially unconvincing in light of the evidence that he had two sisters who already lived in the immediate vicinity of his mother (see Matter of Reach v. Reach, 307 A.D.2d 512, 761 N.Y.S.2d 417; Matter of Diamond v. Diamond, 254 A.D.2d 288, 289, 678 N.Y.S.2d 127; Adinolfi v. Adinolfi, 242 A.D.2d 311, 661 N.Y.S.2d 985; Matter of Doyle v. Doyle, 230 A.D.2d 795, 796, 646 N.Y.S.2d 372). Thus, the father “failed to sustain his burden to rebut the prima facie evidence of willfulness by showing sufficient proof of his inability to pay” (Matter of Watson v. Watson, supra at 498, 799 N.Y.S.2d 809). Accordingly, the Support Magistrate's finding that the father willfully failed to obey the order of support “was supported by the record and properly confirmed by the Family Court” (Matter of Zielazny v. Zielazny, 271 A.D.2d 539, 706 N.Y.S.2d 916).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 30, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)